MyToken
market_cap
FGI:
cryptocurrencies
取引所
ETH Gas
日本語
暗号通貨
デリバティブ
MyTokenAI
MEME
ETF
取引所
コピートレード
大口送金
メディア
カレンダー
ログイン
登録
ニュース
速報
取引所Twitter
KOL Twitter
メディアに入る
Vinny Lingham
02-06 18:24
@VinnyLingham
Why is this controversial in the USA? I'm originally from South Africa, and you cannot vote there without a South African ID. The real question then is: Are we ok with non-citizens voting in our elections? I don't know a country in the world that allows that.
@WhiteHouse:
Pass the SAVE AMERICA ACT and SECURE OUR ELECTIONS! https://t.co/JUBYKwV3EY
Vinny Lingham
02-06 18:20
@VinnyLingham
@transparentnode
@paalsky
@julianhosp
@BSVAssociation
hey
@grok
does BSV use the original DAA that BTC uses?
Vinny Lingham
02-06 18:20
@VinnyLingham
RT
@EnigmaFund
: My biggest recommendation to every investor: Only invest in people you feel aligned with from a point of integrity. How they treat you in discussions and present on CT is how they will treat your money. Yesterday,
@VinnyLingham
shared something I completely resonate with: "If whatever you are doing feels or looks shady, or even slightly suspicious, I'm not investing." Too often we are tempted by smooth talking entrepreneurs, or WORSE: there is a vibe that "It's ok, they're autistic." Let me tell you that is straight up pure mind-virus bs. Trust your instincts. Your instincts live in your body. Your thoughts live in your head. Often your head lies to you and finds reasons to pursue greed or FOMO. Not your body. It cannot lie. Think about when you were once hurt. Notice how the pain (emotional and physical) present again as discomfort in your body? Bingo. The body has an unfiltered direct connecti
@EnigmaFund:
My biggest recommendation to every investor: Only invest in people you feel aligned with from a point of integrity. How they treat you in discussions and present on CT is how they will treat your money. Yesterday, @VinnyLingham shared something I completely resonate with: "If whatever you are doing feels or looks shady, or even slightly suspicious, I'm not investing." Too often we are tempted by smooth talking entrepreneurs, or WORSE: there is a vibe that "It's ok, they're autistic." Let me tell you that is straight up pure mind-virus bs. Trust your instincts. Your instincts live in your body. Your thoughts live in your head. Often your head lies to you and finds reasons to pursue greed or FOMO. Not your body. It cannot lie. Think about when you were once hurt. Notice how the pain (emotional and physical) present again as discomfort in your body? Bingo. The body has an unfiltered direct connection to absolute memory/ subconscious. So when you feel "squirmish" around someone, it's because your memory and subconscious have no filter to the body connection. The body literally, cannot lie. So the next time you're about to hit that "buy" or "invest" button, take a moment to sit down, close your eyes and listen to your subconscious's wisdom through your body. Know when it's your mind making stories... or the truth revealed.
Vinny Lingham
02-06 18:19
@VinnyLingham
@Shepher05365963
@NoLimitGains
order of operations, money first
karl.floersch.eth (✨?_?✨)
02-06 17:27
@karl_dot_tech
RT
@austingriffith
:
@Pixe1_eth
@ClawdOS
@Clawnch_Bot
finally
@karl_dot_tech
look, the sloperating system has arrived!
@austingriffith:
@Pixe1_eth @ClawdOS @Clawnch_Bot finally @karl_dot_tech look, the sloperating system has arrived!
Vinny Lingham
02-06 17:22
@VinnyLingham
@rednunwod
@ColinTCrypto
@gavinandresen
https://t.co/bO2atDrsoI
vitalik.eth
02-06 17:02
@VitalikButerin
It's a good decision! ENS names and records are a form of state that is central to the Ethereum ecosystem, the state is limited in size and there is high value in it being as accessible as possible from anywhere. It's also a semi-financial application, in the sense that buying and holding ENS names has a cost, and ENS names can become very valuable objects. With the expanded scaling roadmap, Ethereum L1 is the ideal place for these applications. More generally, I expect that the optimal architecture for decentralized identity and social (the general space I see ENS being in) is to have this kind of per-user account and profile data on L1, and to have special-purpose L2s, likely much simpler than full EVMs, to handle user actions (eg. actions on social platforms).
@katherineykwu:
A quick update on ENSv2: we have made the decision to deploy ENSv2 exclusively on Ethereum L1 and to cease development of Namechain. To be clear, ENSv2 will still ship. The only thing that’s changed is that instead of deploying ENSv2 on our own L2 stack, it will be deployed on L1. It is important to note that ENSv2 is ultimately an upgrade to ENS as it exists today — it’s still ENS! Regardless of where it ultimately gets deployed, it does not fundamentally change ENS the protocol nor does it change any part of our mission and ultimate goal of building the identity layer on Ethereum. The design for ENSv2 was always intended to work fully as designed, whether deployed on L1 or L2. Our product roadmap does not change. We have detailed progress on the ENSv2 Hub to show what exactly v2 will mean for you, and what the team has been building: giving each name its own registry (making your .eth names more powerful and customizable to your own rules!), building two brand new apps from the ground up (both deployed to testnet this week), and much more. I am so excited for this release (soon!) and think it will completely change the way you interact with your own ENS names. The timing of this decision coincides with a broader discussion about the role of L2s in Ethereum. I continue to believe that L2s play a vital role in extending the value of the world computer that is Ethereum, and ENS will continue to support as many chains as possible. In fact, very soon anyone will be able to register a .eth name regardless of which EVM chain they are on — meaning that even if your assets live on Optimism or Arbitrum, it’s a one-click process (no bridge, no gas tokens). We also continue to believe in a multi-chain world beyond EVM chains (a reminder that ENS has and always will support your addresses across major chains like Solana, Bitcoin, and more). We have published the detailed rationale for the decision to stay on L1 on our blog, and I encourage you to read it (in the QT here!) The .eth stays on 🫡
vitalik.eth
02-06 16:46
@VitalikButerin
@RyanSAdams
ETH is a store of value and one of the most important apps on ethereum.
Felipe
02-06 16:41
@PhilCrypto77
The absolute state of the crypto industry. We are not serious people
@BitcoinNewsCom:
BITHUMB ACCIDENTALLY SENDS OUT 2000 BTC TO USERS WHO IMMEDIATELY MARKET DUMP A major operational mistake at South Korea’s crypto exchange Bithumb reportedly led to the accidental distribution of 2,000 BTC ($130M) instead of 2,000 KRW ($1.50) as a rewards payout. According to multiple reports, a staff member intended to issue a small random prize worth about $1.50 but mistakenly entered BTC as the unit. As a result, hundreds of users received unexpected Bitcoin payouts, totaling roughly 2,000 BTC, valued near $130M at current prices. Recipients immediately sold, causing Bitcoin on Bithumb to crash more than 10% below global market prices before stabilizing. The incident highlights how internal ledger errors and off-chain accounting can still create severe market dislocations, even in 2026, with no corresponding on-chain movement of real Bitcoin. A costly reminder that exchange risk remains very real.
vitalik.eth
02-06 16:35
@VitalikButerin
@ShieldedLabs
Zcash good Zooko good Adding hybrid proof of stake good
Vinny Lingham
02-06 16:24
@VinnyLingham
@51793977C
@dampedspring
Load up!
Vinny Lingham
02-06 15:59
@VinnyLingham
@Btc21mdividedX
@NoLimitGains
If you don’t financialize bitcoin, and it’s a high velocity payment system volatility drops because market manipulation is stymied
Vinny Lingham
02-06 15:58
@VinnyLingham
@paalsky
@julianhosp
That’s a myopic view. Exchanges (and users) have no certainty that there won’t be a deep reorg if the DAA changes so quickly. Doesn’t matter for micropayments but matters for larger value transactions. Look, you can believe what you want - clearly there is a problem.
Vinny Lingham
02-06 15:45
@VinnyLingham
@NoLimitGains
This is exactly why Bitcoin works as a peer to peer electronic currency but not a store of value.
Vinny Lingham
02-06 15:41
@VinnyLingham
RT
@NoLimitGains
: Bitcoin has a huge problem that nobody talks about. Is everyone ignoring it on purpose? Possibly. But bitcoin’s fundamental thesis has changed drastically. The hard truth? 21 million is no longer the maximum supply. I’ve been in this game since the Mt. Gox days. We used to worry about exchange hacks. Now? We should be worrying about financialization. If you think bitcoin is purely supply vs. demand, you’re trading a market that doesn't exist anymore. Maxis won’t tell you this, but bitcoin has been fractionalized. Wall Street didn’t buy bitcoin to pump your bags and make you rich lol. They bought it to turn it into a fee-generating instrument, just like they did with gold in the 80s. The paper bitcoin multiplier: In the old days, 1 BTC = 1 BTC. You held the keys, you owned the asset. Today, thanks to ETFs, lending, and the futures/derivatives complex, one bitcoin can support multiple layers of claims and price exposure at
@NoLimitGains:
Bitcoin has a huge problem that nobody talks about. Is everyone ignoring it on purpose? Possibly. But bitcoin’s fundamental thesis has changed drastically. The hard truth? 21 million is no longer the maximum supply. I’ve been in this game since the Mt. Gox days. We used to worry about exchange hacks. Now? We should be worrying about financialization. If you think bitcoin is purely supply vs. demand, you’re trading a market that doesn't exist anymore. Maxis won’t tell you this, but bitcoin has been fractionalized. Wall Street didn’t buy bitcoin to pump your bags and make you rich lol. They bought it to turn it into a fee-generating instrument, just like they did with gold in the 80s. The paper bitcoin multiplier: In the old days, 1 BTC = 1 BTC. You held the keys, you owned the asset. Today, thanks to ETFs, lending, and the futures/derivatives complex, one bitcoin can support multiple layers of claims and price exposure at the same time. Here’s the idea: 1. The Base: 1 real BTC sits with a custodian (backing an ETF or large holder). 2. The Hedge: Market makers and funds use CME futures/options to hedge that exposure. 3. The Leverage: Traders take perp positions (cash-settled) that multiply BTC exposure without touching spot. 4. The Wrapper: BTC can be locked and tokenized (wrapped) for DeFi yield, creating another claim layer. 5. The Note: Banks issue structured products tied to BTC price/volatility. More exposure, more claims. That’s one coin on-chain. But it’s FIVE CLAIMS in the order book. When supply is elastic (via derivatives), scarcity is irrelevant in the short term. They can print infinite paper BTC to absorb demand, capping rallies and forcing liquidations whenever they want liquidity. This is exactly how they destroyed Gold's volatility. Can it be fixed? There’s only one way to make the 21 Million cap real again. Get your coins off exchanges and take self-custody. As long as your coins are sitting on a centralized ledger, they’re being used as collateral to bet against you. That doesn’t make me bearish long term, because I’ve seen this same setup before. Btw I’ll share a new BTC update very soon, do not miss it. Remember, I called the EXACT bitcoin top at $126k in october. When I start deploying capital again, I’ll say it here like I always do. A lot of people will regret not following me.
Vinny Lingham
02-06 15:40
@VinnyLingham
@viveksworld
@XASH_USDX
USDX is the stablecoin, XASH is the rewards token.
Vinny Lingham
02-06 15:39
@VinnyLingham
@paalsky
@julianhosp
BSV in its current form is broken. The DAA has to revert to the original one that Satoshi designed. Exchanges require 24 hours of confirmations. Can be fixed but currently broken. And the devs that say it’s needed don’t understand economics and utility.
Andre Cronje
02-06 15:23
@AndreCronjeTech
RT
@impossible_
: Flying Tulip | FAQ ▫️ Why should I invest in Flying Tulip at a $1B valuation? The FDV depends on the volume of investments raised. You're not investing at a $1B valuation, but at a fixed price of 1 FT = $0.1. The final FDV depends on the total amount raised. → For example, if the project raises $200M, the FDV will be $200M. The project is capped at a hard cap of $1B = 10B FT. ▫️ How do I participate in the Public Sale? → Go to the platform: https://t.co/JpmQY2q84r → Complete KYC (takes about 5 minutes) → Invest any amount Official support chat: https://t.co/66jx6ioV2s ▫️ When does the Public Sale end? The sale on Impossible will run until February 16th inclusive. ▫️ How does the purchase work and what exactly do I receive? After purchase, the FT received is issued in the form of a Perpetual PUT, represented on-chain through your FT NFT (ftPUT). Perpetual PUT is a perpetual on-chain right attached to FT obtained during the init
@impossible_:
Flying Tulip | FAQ ▫️ Why should I invest in Flying Tulip at a $1B valuation? The FDV depends on the volume of investments raised. You're not investing at a $1B valuation, but at a fixed price of 1 FT = $0.1. The final FDV depends on the total amount raised. → For example, if the project raises $200M, the FDV will be $200M. The project is capped at a hard cap of $1B = 10B FT. ▫️ How do I participate in the Public Sale? → Go to the platform: https://t.co/JpmQY2q84r → Complete KYC (takes about 5 minutes) → Invest any amount Official support chat: https://t.co/66jx6ioV2s ▫️ When does the Public Sale end? The sale on Impossible will run until February 16th inclusive. ▫️ How does the purchase work and what exactly do I receive? After purchase, the FT received is issued in the form of a Perpetual PUT, represented on-chain through your FT NFT (ftPUT). Perpetual PUT is a perpetual on-chain right attached to FT obtained during the initial placement, which gives the holder three options: 1. Hold - keep the PUT open (FT remains inside the NFT). You do nothing. You preserve your right to exit at face value while remaining a participant in potential FT price growth. 2. Exit - exit at face value, return collateral. This means you exchange FT back for the same asset and in the same volume that you initially deposited. Example: 10,000 FT ↔ 1,000 USDT 3. Withdraw - unlock FT from PUT. This means the PUT for this portion of the position is cancelled. The assets backing your position are released. The released capital is used by the protocol for FT buyback-and-burn from the open market. After Withdraw, your FT becomes fully free: you can hold, trade, or transfer tokens anywhere. ▫️ Can you explain in simple terms and provide examples? Step 1. What happens when you invest? You invest 100 USDT → receive 1000 FT tokens. Instead of receiving FT directly, you receive a special NFT called ftPUT. The NFT contains your 1000 FT, the right to return the deposited stablecoins, and a record of your 100 USDT investment. In short, your FT and protection are inside one NFT. Step 2. Now you have an NFT. What can you do? There are several options, let's go through them in order. Option 1: Lock in profit if the price rises. Let's say FT rises to $0.20 (2x). Your 1000 FT = 200 USDT. You can withdraw FT from the NFT and sell them on the market, locking in profit. You don't have to sell everything - you can withdraw only part of the FT and preserve the Perpetual PUT on the remaining portion. Option 2: Get your money back if the price falls. Let's say FT falls to $0.05 (-50%). Normally you would lose money. But here you can burn the NFT and get back your 100 USDT. As a result, you invested 100 USDT and received back 100 USDT. Option 3: Wait and do nothing. You can simply hold the NFT waiting for potential profit. The option is perpetual, and you retain your FT tokens and downside protection. You can make a decision later, without market pressure. Option 4: Instead of selling FT, you can sell the NFT on the marketplace. Why would someone buy it? → Because the NFT is FT with built-in Perpetual PUT protection, so it's more valuable than regular FT. → If the FT price rises, the NFT sells at a premium - the protection remains. → If the FT price falls, the NFT also sells well because the protection doesn't go anywhere. ▫️ How do I sell my NFT or get back my invested funds? Selling, burning, withdrawing part of the position here: https://t.co/nA4bvLToIQ NFT marketplace here: https://t.co/HQvQTkmfRW ▫️ How is the team reward model structured and what are their incentives? The team earns their allocation only when the protocol generates real revenue from its products, not just earning yield from deploying others' capital. Thus, the team is incentivized to build working products, not just keep investor capital in staking. Let's now understand how the mechanics work: Yield = income from deploying investor capital in DeFi (staking, lending strategies) → does not trigger token unlock for the team. Part of this income goes to buying back tokens from the market for subsequent burning, and another part goes to operational expenses. Revenue = income from Flying Tulip products (trading fees, protocol products: lending, ftUSD, etc.) → triggers unlock. When buyback is funded specifically by protocol revenue, then unlock occurs in a 40:40:20 ratio. 40% → Foundation 40% → Team 20% → Incentives How this works technically When the protocol does a revenue-funded buyback, that is: Buys FT from the market → burns them → unlocks the same amount in a 1:1 proportion. The 1:1 proportion means that for every $1 of revenue from Flying Tulip products directed to buyback and burn, an equivalent of $1 in tokens is unlocked for three categories: Foundation, Team, Incentives. Crucially, the protocol assigns the right to receive tokens through future buybacks, rather than unlocking them from some reserve. ▫️ Why isn't Flying Tulip planning to list on centralized exchanges? The project isn't building a model around centralized exchange listings. The protocol creates its own trading infrastructure where primary liquidity is formed and price discovery occurs. The FT token from the initial placement is tied to the Perpetual PUT mechanism, so its economics differ from classic tokens that immediately go to CEX listing. Additionally, the FT price is formed through the internal market and buyback mechanics: the protocol directs revenue to token buyback and burn. Liquidity is created within the ecosystem, not through external market makers. The project doesn't exclude listings in the future, but the current focus is on developing proprietary infrastructure and products. ▫️ When is the FT token TGE scheduled? The TGE date hasn't been announced yet, but your funds are already working and forming a reserve fund for token buyback and burn. Protocol TVL and revenue: https://t.co/2ZXTLsmPIa Fundraising progress: https://t.co/UEmJxd6Df8 ▫️ Disclaimer: While this system is designed to protect your principal, it does not eliminate all risks. Your participation remains subject to various risks, including, without limitation, smart contract bugs, exploits, operational errors and other unforeseen technical or economic events that may result in partial or total loss of your assets. No guarantees or assurances of safety, performance, or returns are provided by CURATED. This FAQ is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. You participate at your own risk and should always do your own research, obtain advice from a qualified professional and fully understand all risks before participating.
Vinny Lingham
02-06 15:05
@VinnyLingham
@dampedspring
The stupidity of MSTR holders is mind blowing
Vinny Lingham
02-06 15:01
@VinnyLingham
@OVGNFT
@SecScottBessent
@XASH_USDX
🙇🏽♂️