According to Huoxun Finance, Peter Van Valkenburgh, Executive Director of Coin Center, stated that if the CLARITY bill, which establishes a crypto market structure, fails to pass, the US government, which is unfriendly to the industry, may further strengthen its regulation of the crypto sector. If the CLARITY bill and the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act's provisions on developer protection are rejected, and short-term commercial interests and the current regulatory environment are prioritized, the industry may face a disadvantageous situation. He further pointed out that the core purpose of the CLARITY bill is to constrain future governments through law, rather than relying on the attitude of the current government; without relevant legal protection, the crypto industry may be affected by enforcement discretion, policy changes, and uncertainty. He disclosed that the CLARITY bill has already been blocked in the Senate because banks, crypto companies, and legislators have not reached an agreement on key provisions (including whether to allow stablecoin yields); the bill covers a crypto intermediary registration framework, digital asset regulation, and token classification. Furthermore, in the absence of legislative clarity, the US Department of Justice may strengthen enforcement against developers of privacy tools, designating them as unregistered money transfer institutions, and existing regulatory interpretative guidance may also be withdrawn. Previously, former Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chairman Gary Gensler was criticized by the industry for pushing policy through enforcement actions and settlements with crypto companies rather than developing formal rules. Since his resignation on January 20, 2025, the SEC has dropped several long-standing enforcement cases against crypto companies and issued more lenient regulatory guidance.

According to Huoxun Finance, at 14:03, 473.55 BTC (worth approximately $31.61 million) were transferred from an anonymous address starting with bc1q0y5l... to another anonymous address starting with bc1q3eh...

According to Peter Van Valkenburgh, Executive Director of Coin Center, if the Crypto Market Structure Act (CLARITY Act) fails to pass, a future US government that is unfriendly to the industry may further strengthen its regulation of the crypto sector. If the developer protection legislation in the CLARITY Act and the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act is rejected, and short-term commercial interests and the current regulatory environment are prioritized, the industry could face a disadvantageous situation. Van Valkenburgh stated that the purpose of the CLARITY Act is to constrain future governments through law, not to rely on the attitude of the current government; without relevant legal protection, the crypto industry may be affected by enforcement discretion, policy changes, and uncertainty. He disclosed that the CLARITY Act has already been blocked in the Senate because banks, crypto companies, and legislators failed to reach an agreement on key provisions (including whether to allow stablecoin yields). The bill covers a crypto intermediary registration framework, digital asset regulation, and token classification. Furthermore, in the absence of legislative clarity, the Department of Justice may strengthen enforcement against privacy tool developers, treating them as unregistered money transfer institutions, and existing regulatory interpretative guidance may also be withdrawn. Former SEC Chairman Gary Gensler faced industry criticism for pushing policy through enforcement actions and settlements with crypto companies, and for informally shaping rules. Since his departure on January 20, 2025, the SEC has dropped several long-standing enforcement cases against crypto companies and issued more lenient regulatory guidance. (Cointelegraph)

Huoxun Finance reported on March 29th that Peter Van Valkenburgh, Executive Director of Coin Center, warned that if the CLARITY bill, a crypto market structure, fails to pass, a future US government unfriendly to the industry may suppress it without clear rules. He stated that the core purpose of legislation is to constrain the next administration, and the lack of legal protection will expose the industry to the risks of prosecutorial discretion and political dictates. It is understood that the CLARITY bill is stalled in the Senate because banks, crypto companies, and lawmakers have failed to reach an agreement on key terms such as stablecoin yields. Van Valkenburgh further pointed out that if the current legislative window is missed, the Department of Justice may increase its prosecution of privacy tool developers, and existing regulatory guidelines may be withdrawn.

According to Huoxun Finance, at the recent Global Unicorn Companies Conference, Zhou Hongyi, founder of 360, explained the booming "Lobster Craze" (OpenClaw intelligent agent). Regarding the question of "when will tokens become as accessible and affordable to ordinary people as mobile data," Zhou Hongyi stated: The core of the traditional internet is data traffic. Its infrastructure (such as fiber optic cables) has almost unlimited capacity, and user data usage is directly proportional to duration and volume, with lower marginal costs as the platform gains more users. However, AI is completely different from the traditional internet—AI's operation is essentially about computing power consumption, information processing, and "intellectual costs," following the logic of information and energy conservation: the more complex the task and the deeper the demand, the higher the computing power and resources consumed will be. It's impossible to complete extremely complex tasks with minimal investment. Tokens are a unit of measurement for the intellectual and computing power consumed by artificial intelligence, with a relatively fixed unit price; the more they are used, the higher the cost. Therefore, tokens can never achieve unlimited monthly usage like mobile data.